SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ori) 324

SANJU PANDA, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Dinabandhu Kar – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s. S.B. Mohanty, S. Mohapatra
For the Opp. Parties : Mr. M.S. Sahoo

JUDGMENT :

S.N. Prasad, J.

This writ petition is under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 21.7.2016 passed by the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in O.A. No. 1922(C) of 2015 wherein the order of transfer as contained in Office Order No. 16661 dated 28.5.2015 has been refused to be interfered with by dismissing the Original Application.

2. The petitioner’s case is that he was appointed as driver in pursuance of the order dated 13.8.1996, which is under the Directorate cadre and as such, his transfer from Bhubaneswar Special Jail to Choudwar Central Jail vide order No. 16661 dated 28.5.2015 is illegal reason being that since he is of the Directorate cadre, he cannot be transferred elsewhere save and except to remain posted in the office of the Directorate, but the Tribunal without appreciating this aspect of the matter, has dismissed the Original Application treating him as a driver under the State cadre, which is impugned in the instant writ petition.

3. The opposite party-State has put its appearance before the Tribunal as before this Court and has taken a specific stand that the petitioner was appointed under the State ca





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top