SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ori) 336

S.K.SAHOO
Ipsita Pratihari – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri Asok Mohanty
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Deepak Kumar

JUDGMENT :

S.K. Sahoo, J.

The petitioner Ipsita Pratihari has filed the criminal revision petition vide CRLREV No. 887 of 2016 to set aside the impugned order dated 05.08.2016 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Puri in G.R. Case No. 1561 of 2016 in which the prayer made by the Investigating Officer for issuance of proclamation under section 82 of Cr.P.C. against the petitioner was allowed. Similarly the petitioner has filed another criminal revision petition vide CRLREV No. 886 of 2016 to set aside the impugned order dated 05.11.2016 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Puri in allowing the prayer made by the Investigating Officer for attachment/freezing of the accounts and properties of the petitioner and also the consequential order dated 19.11.2016 of the Deputy Supdt. of Police, City, Puri in which he has locked, sealed and attached the property of the petitioner. The said case arises out of Singhadwar P.S. Case No. 46 of 2016 registered on 18.07.2016 under sections 143, 341, 353, 294, 506, 186, 188 read with section 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30-A (4)(b) of Sri Jagannath Temple Act, 1955.

Since both the revision petitions arise out the same case and the petitioner is the s
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top