SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ori) 435

A.K.RATH
Sudarsan Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Kuni Sahu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D.P Mohanty, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

DR. A.K.RATH, J.

1. This petition challenges the order dated 1.5.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Keonjhar in C.S. No.95 of 2009. By the said order, learned trial court rejected the application of the plaintiff under Order 1 Rule 10 and Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC to implead the transferees of the suit land as parties and amendment of the plaint.

2. The petitioner as plaintiff instituted the suit for partition impleading the opposite parties as defendants. Pursuant to issuance of summons, defendants entered appearance and filed written statement. While the matter stood thus, the plaintiff filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 and Order 6 Rule 17 to implead the transferees as parties and to incorporate the prayer that the subsequent sale deeds executed by defendants 2 and 3 in favour of the transferees are not binding on him and to declare the same as null and void. The defendant filed an objection to the same. It is stated that in the written statement, they have specified about the execution of the sale deeds. The plaintiff has full knowledge of the same. The suit for declaration of the sale deeds as null and void is barred by li

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top