SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ori) 1011

A.K.RATH
State of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Guman Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ms. Samapika Mishra, ASC.
For the Respondent:Mr. Tarun Ku. Patnaik, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Dr. A.K.Rath, J.

1. This is a defendants’ appeal against the judgment and decree dated 10.5.1996 and 19.6.1996 respectively passed by the learned District Judge, Balasore-Bhadrak, Balasore in S.J Money Appeal No.6 of 1995-III partly modifying the judgment and decree dated 11.1.1995 and 27.1.1995 respectively passed by the learned Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Balasore in M.S No.14/109 of 1991-III of 1987.

2. Case of the plaintiff is that he was the authorised agent and partner of Shri S.S Das. He had the licence for purchasing, storing and selling of rice and paddy under clause 4(2) of the Orissa Rice and Paddy Control Order, 1965. On 29.7.1982, he transported 100 quintal of rice in 100 bags to Baripada in his truck. The Asst. Civil Supplies Officer, Balasore seized the truck at Nilgiri. An FIR was lodged. The document was seized by the police. He approached the authority for release of the truck along with rice. But then, the A.D.M., Balasore passed the order to sell the rice. Thereafter, the rice was sold for a sum of Rs.19,359.50 ps. The sale proceeds were deposited in the treasury. Charge sheet was submitted against him. He was discharged on the ground that he ha













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top