SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Ori) 10

S.K.SAHOO
Bidyadhar Samal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Prem Kumar Patnaik

JUDGMENT :

S.K. Sahoo, J.

The petitioner Bidyadhar Samal in this application under section 482 of Cr.P.C. has challenged the impugned order dated 20.06.2002 passed by the learned J.M.F.C., Baramba in G.R. Case No. 49 of 2000 in taking cognizance of the offences under sections 450/376/506 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereafter in short ‘SC & ST (POA) Act’) and issuance of process against him. The said case arises out of Baramba P.S. Case No.49 of 2000.

2. It appears that on the basis of first information report submitted by the victim before the officer in charge of Baramba police station on 28.04.2000, Baramba P.S. Case No.49 of 2000 was registered under sections 450/376/506 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3 of the SC & ST (PA) Act. After registration of the case, the officer in charge himself took up investigation of the case, examined the victim and other witnesses, visited the spot, seized incriminating materials, sent the victim for medical examination, seized the wearing apparels and vaginal swab of the victim collected by the Medial Officer and prayed before the learned J.M.F.C.





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top