B.K.NAYAK, D.P.CHOUDHURY
Sanatan Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa, represented through the Special Secretary to Government, General Administration – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
D.P. CHOUDHURY, J.
1. The petitioner assails the order vide Annexure-6 issued by the opposite parties by retiring him compulsorily from Government service.
FACTS:
2. The factual matrix leading to filing of the writ petition is that the petitioner was appointed as LDC/Junior Clerk in the Judgeship of Kandhamal-Boudh, Phulbani on 25.11.1981. On 10.10.1997, he was promoted to the post of Senior Clerk and on 02.12.2003, he was promoted to the post of Sheristadar in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-J.M.F.C., Kantamal. The petitioner has rendered service purportedly from 25.11.1981 to 10.05.2010 with all sincerity and integrity. But on 07.08.2010 the Registrar Civil Courts, Phulbani made a communication to the effect that the District Review Committee held on 31.07.2010 observed that the petitioner is warned with an instruction to avoid shirking responsibility in attending the office work and be active in his duty. The petitioner was directed to be kept under observation till the next Review Meeting vide Annexure-1. On that day the petitioner was also issued with
Baldev Raj Chadha v. Union of India and others; AIR 1981 SC 70
Baikuntha Nath Das v. Chief District Medical Officer; (1992) 2 SCC 299
Pyare Mohan Lal v. State of Jharkhand; (2010) 10 SCC 693
State of Punjab Vs. Dewan Chuni Lal
Baidyanath Mahapatra Vs. State of Orissa
State of Orissa V. Ram Chandra Das;(1996) 5 SCC 331
State of Gujarat V. Umedbhai M. Patel
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and others v. Babu Lal Jangir; (2013) 10 SCC 551
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.