JUDGMENT :

S. K. SAHOO, J.

1. The petitioners have filed this application under section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the impugned order dated 06.01.2012 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Bhubaneswar in I.C.C. No.273 of 2010 in rejecting the petition filed by the petitioners for sending Exts.3 to 5 and Exts.9/1 and 9/2 to the handwriting expert along with admitted writings of the complainant and the accused persons with a direction to make examination of the question documents and to submit the report. Though another petition was filed by the petitioners for summoning I.C.C. of Keonjhar police station to produce S.D. Entry No.148 dated 29.07.2009 and to issue summon to the Post Master, G.P.O. to proof the delivery of the letter dated 18.11.2009 to Nihar Ranjan Patnaik and the said petition was also rejected but the learned counsel for the petitioners confined his challenge to the rejection of the petition relating to the sending of the exhibits to the handwriting expert. The factual scenario of the case indicates that the opposite party is the complainant in I.C.C. Case No.273 of 2010 and the petitioners are the accused persons the complaint petition was filed for prosecuting the accused