SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ori) 1220

A.K.RATH
Chandrama Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Kishore Chandra Mishra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. D.K. Sahoo
For the Respondents: Mr. Y. Mohanty

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Rath, J.

Plaintiffs are the appellants against a confirming judgment. The suit was for declaration of title, confirmation of possession and in the alternative recovery of possession and for permanent injunction.

2. The case of the plaintiffs is that one Baidyanath Sarangi had two sons, namely, Basudev and Bamadev, plaintiff no.2. While they were living jointly, they sold a piece of ancestral land. Out of the sale proceeds, Basudev purchased the suit land. The suit property was acquired out of joint family fund. Plaintiff no.2 had share over it. Basudev, after death of his wife, adopted Chandrama, plaintiff no.1, daughter of Bamadev as his daughter about 16 years back and gave her marriage with Ramesh Chandra Mishra. After marriage, plaintiff no.1 and her husband resided in the house of Basudev. While the matter stood thus, Basudev fell ill. Defendant no.2, who is the son of maternal uncle of Basudev, fraudulently got a registered deed of gift on 16.8.78 in favour of his son, Kishore Chandra Mishra, defendant no.1. The gift deed had not been acted upon. After death of Basudev, plaintiff no.1 enjoyed the suit property and used to pay rent. It was further pleaded that in

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top