B.K.NAYAK, D.P.CHOUDHURY
Ranjit Prasad Das – Appellant
Versus
Member, Board of Revenue, Orissa, Cuttack – Respondent
ORDER
05.04.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners Opposite Party No. 3 and learned counsel for the State.
Perused the case records.
2. In this writ petition the petitioners have challenged the Order dated 15.03.2008 passed by the Member Board of Revenue Orissa in. OEA Revision Case No. 84 of 2002.
3. Brief facts of the case are as follows:-
The disputed property measuring Ac. 0.25 pertaining to Sabik Plot No. 290 under Sabik Khata No. 25 in Mouza-Naripur corresponding to Hal Plot No. 434 under Hal Khata No. 216 was the property of ex-intermediary. Admittedly the intermediary sold the same property by Registered Sale Deed No. 8460 in favour of one Laxmi Das who subsequently sold the same in favour of the father of present Opposite Party No. 3 vide Registered Sale Deed No. 57 dated 28.01.1946. The further undisputed fact is that the intermediary interest in respect of the property vested in the State on 13.04.1961 Us. 3-A of the Orissa Estate Abolition Act 1951 and no one having filed any claim application for settlement the property was recorded in the Hal Bebandobasta Khata No. 11782. A Suo motu Bebandobasta case was initiated before Tahasildar Bhadrak bearing OEA No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.