SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ori) 1310

B.K.NAYAK, D.P.CHOUDHURY
Ranjit Prasad Das – Appellant
Versus
Member, Board of Revenue, Orissa, Cuttack – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
.

ORDER

05.04.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners Opposite Party No. 3 and learned counsel for the State.

Perused the case records.

2. In this writ petition the petitioners have challenged the Order dated 15.03.2008 passed by the Member Board of Revenue Orissa in. OEA Revision Case No. 84 of 2002.

3. Brief facts of the case are as follows:-

The disputed property measuring Ac. 0.25 pertaining to Sabik Plot No. 290 under Sabik Khata No. 25 in Mouza-Naripur corresponding to Hal Plot No. 434 under Hal Khata No. 216 was the property of ex-intermediary. Admittedly the intermediary sold the same property by Registered Sale Deed No. 8460 in favour of one Laxmi Das who subsequently sold the same in favour of the father of present Opposite Party No. 3 vide Registered Sale Deed No. 57 dated 28.01.1946. The further undisputed fact is that the intermediary interest in respect of the property vested in the State on 13.04.1961 Us. 3-A of the Orissa Estate Abolition Act 1951 and no one having filed any claim application for settlement the property was recorded in the Hal Bebandobasta Khata No. 11782. A Suo motu Bebandobasta case was initiated before Tahasildar Bhadrak bearing OEA No.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top