D.DASH
Tirtha Bararty – Appellant
Versus
Dingar Kanda – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.S. A. No.159 of 2005
Misc.Case Nos. 716, 717 & 718 of 2016.
20.6.2017. Mr. H.S. Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the appellants (L.Rs. of deceased appellant No.10) is permitted to insert his name in the relevant column of the Vakalatnama.
Heard learned Counsel for the appellants who are the legal representatives of deceased appellant no.10 and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the son of the deceased-respondent No.1.
Considering the submission and on going through the petition averments as also viewing other circumstances, the prayers for substitution of the legal representatives of appellant No.10 is allowed.
Misc. Case is accordingly disposed of.
Sd. D. Dash, J.
(A) Misc. Case Nos.719, 720 & 721 of 2016.
(B) Misc. Case No.493 of 2016.
&
(C) Misc. Case No.672 of 2016.
20.06.2017. Miscellaneous petition under (A) have been filed for substitution of the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.1, by setting aside the abatement of the appeal and condoning the delay in filing the said petition for setting aside the abatement.
Miscellaneous petition under (B) has been filed by the son of the deceased respondent No.1 praying to pass an order of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.