SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Ori) 594

D.P.CHOUDHURY
Chittaranjan @ Biswajit Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
.

ORDER

28.8.2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Standing Counsel.

2. The L.C.R. is received from the 3rd Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge-cum-P.O. C.C. Cuttack (Vc) along with explanation. Perused the explanation and the same is accepted.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Principal Magistrate Juvenile Justice Board, Cuttack in J.J.C. No.13 of 2018 has rejected the bail of the present petitioner who was earlier forwarded under Section 302 I.P.C., but later on charge sheet has been submitted under Section 306 I.P.C. According to him, the JJB, Special Court, Cuttack considered the bail application of the petitioner as if the bail application is filed by an adult person. According to him under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (in short ‘the Act, the petitioner being a juvenile is entitled for bail There is neither any observation of the JJB nor of the Special Court that the bail is liable to be rejected for the three reasons as mentioned in Section 12 of the Act.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there was only allegation against the petitioner-child (CCL) that th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top