JUDGMENT

BISWANATH RATH, J. - Both the writ petitions involve a challenge to the order passed by the Revisional Authority in OLR Revision Case Nos.236 of 1984 and 239 of 1984 by the learned Member, Board of Revenue, Orissa disposed of in the common impugned order passed in exercise of power under Section 59(2) of the Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960.

2. A common order was passed by the Revisional Authority involving both the aforesaid Revisions for the reason not only having common facts but also the question to be determined being similar in both the applications though involved two patches of land under two Tahasils.

3. At the beginning of the argument, Shri A.K. Mishra, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the opposite parties-State raising the question of maintainability of the writ petition for involvement of the locus standi of the petitioners in filing the aforesaid writ petitions, contended that looking to the factual disclosures and the parties involved in the proceedings bearing OLR Revision Case Nos.236 and 239 of 1984, both the petitioners have no locus standi to come up in the present writ petitions and consequently referring to several documents append