ORDER

17.1.2017. As the facts and grievances of the applicant in O.A. No.2793 (c)/2013 is different from other O.As. and has no nexus with O.A. No.2793 (c)/2013, the said O.A. be delinked from other batch of cases and be listed separately for hearing.

2. Since the applicants in all these cases are similarly situated and the relief sought for is one and same, all these O.As. are taken up together for the sake of convenience and a common order is passed and O.A. No.2447 (c)/2013 is taken as a lead case.

3. Heard Mr. R.N. Nayak, learned Counsel for the applicants and Mr. H.K. Panigrahi, learned Addl. Standing Counsel.

4. The applicant in O.A. No.2447 (c)/2013, who is a retired ACF, has prayed to quash the order of recovery of Rs.70,320/- passed by respondent No.3 dated 10.4.2013 at Annexure-1 read with decision of joint verification committee ( in short JVC ) report dated 11.12.2012.

5. In O.A. No.2448 (c)/2013, the applicant who is a retired ACF, has prayed for quashing of order of recovery of Rs.80,224/- passed by respondent no.3 at Annexure-1 on the basis of the audit report read with decision of joint verification committee (in short JVC) report dated 11.12.2012.

6. In O.A. No.244