SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Ori) 153

MISRA
MST. SILI SILIA ORAMIN – Appellant
Versus
JOSEPH ORAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B. Mohapatra and R.K. Mohapatra, for the Appellant; R.N. Sinha, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

Misra, J. - Defendants 1, 3 and 4 are the Appellants. Plaintiff's suit was for declaration of title and recovery of possession of Ga schedule lands, or, in the alternative, for partition of Kha schedule lands. Kha schedule lands constitute 31. 82 acres village Dahijira in the district of Sundergarh. Ga schedule lands are 16.92 acres forming part of the Kha schedule lands. One Thutuku Gram was the owner of the Kha schedule lands. He was a Christian and died leaving two sons behind-Kalal Gram and Mahindar Oram (Defendant No. 2). Kalal Gram left for Assam sometime before 1930 and is since unheard of and civilly dead. Defendant No. 1 is his widow. Defendant No. 3 is the husband of Defendant No. 1's sister and Defendant No. 4 is the all son-in-law of Defendant No. 1. Defendant no. 2 went to Assam and returned back in 1947. Before going to Assam, Defendant No. 2 surrendered Kha schedule lands to the Gountia who settled the same on the Plaintiff. In 1944, Defendant No. 1 convened a Punchayati and the Plaintiff gave up half of Kha schedule lands in her favour. Plaintiff came into possession of Ga schedule lands after the Punchayat's decision. In paragraph 11 of the complaint Plai












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top