SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Ori) 121

MISRA
STATE OF ORISSA – Appellant
Versus
SANATAN SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate General, for the Appellant; D. Mohanty and S. Ch. Roy, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

Misra, J. - Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts involved in this suit are that plot No. 28 with an area-18-75 acres, plot No. 27-102-95 acres and plot No. 33-30-30 acres belonged to the Raja of Kanika who was the landlord. Plot Nos. 27 and 33 have been recorded as river in the settlement khatian (ext. A) and in the partition decree (ext., 2) as Tandi patha, Bali and water. Plot No. 28 is recorded as Pala, and in the partition decree as Tandi patha. Plot No. 28 is recorded as the Nijchas land of the ex-proprietors while plot Nos. 27 and 33 have been recorded as Anabadi land Plaintiff claims to have come upon this land before 194::5. Plaintiff's case is that he cultivated about 44 acres of land out of plot Nos. 27 and 33 in the year 1951 on payment of rent and he was reclaiming the other lands where Tandi grass was being grown. The estate vested some time in 1952 or 1953. His further case is that for one year after the vesting he held the land under the Anchal on payment of rent. Next year it was put to auction and Defendant No. 2 was the highest bidder. Plaintiff asked for a declaration of his right of occupancy and for a, permanent injunction to restrain the Defendant

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top