SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Ori) 142

G.K.MISRA
GADAM NARASAMMA – Appellant
Versus
DANDASI NAYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.N. Misra, for the Appellant; Y.S.N. Murty, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

G.K. Misra, J. - The suit is for declaration of title and permanent injunction. The disputed land consists of one cent of land in Survey No. 503 in village Boragan within Aska Taluk. Plaintiff's case is that the disputed land belonged to the Government and was assigned to her husband who executed a registered sale deed (Ex. 2) on 13.8.1955 in her favour. The Defendants, who are Bauries of the village, threatened dispossession and hence the suit. The defence case is that the Plaintiff husband encroached upon the suit-site which is a village poromboke. On the objection of the Defendants, Plaintiff's husband was found to have mad the encroachment and an order of eviction was passed. No patta has been granted to the Plaintiff's husband and neither the Plaintiff nor her husband was ever in possession. The learned Munsif found that the Plaintiff had a good title. On a finding that she had been dispossessed, he passed a decree for declaration of title and recovery of possession. The learned Subordinate Judge, in appeal, held that the Plaintiff failed to establish a valid title; and even though she proved her possession, it fell short of the statutory period of 12 years and she h
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top