SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ori) 200

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
S.N. Phukan, A. Pasayat, JJ.
SUSANTA KUMAR KAR - APPELLANT
Versus
REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL), ORISSA HIGH COURT - RESPONDENT
O.J.C. No. 8595 of 1996
Decided On : 14-11-1996

Advocates Appeared:
Abhiram Swain, R.K. Sahoo, P.K. Mohapatra and B.D. Tikayat, for the Appellant; R.K. Mohanty, Additional Government Advocate, for the Respondent

The requirement to notify vacancies to the Employment Exchange under Rule 6 of the Orissa High Court (Appointment of Staff) Rules, 1963, was mandatory, but there was scope for accepting applications directly from candidates who were not sponsored by the Employment Exchange.

Headnote:

APPOINTMENT OF STAFF - ORISSA HIGH COURT (APPOINTMENT OF STAFF) RULES, 1963 - RULE 6 - VALIDITY - DIRECT RECRUITMENT - NOTIFICATION OF VACANCIES TO LOCAL EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE - MANDATORY - SCOPE FOR ACCEPTING APPLICATIONS DIRECTLY - EQUALITY CLAUSE OF ARTS. 14 AND 16 - VIOLATION.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner challenged the validity of Rule 6 of the Orissa High Court (Appointment of Staff) Rules, 1963, which required all appointments by direct recruitment in Class III service to be made by notifying the vacancies to the local Employment Exchange.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that excluding candidates not sponsored through the Employment Exchange and restricting the choice of selection to sponsored candidates would violate the equality clause of Arts. 14 and 16.

Issues: Whether Rule 6 of the Orissa High Court (Appointment of Staff) Rules, 1963, which required all appointments by direct recruitment in Class III service to be made by notifying the vacancies to the local Employment Exchange, was valid.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that sponsoring candidates through the Employment Exchange did not violate Arts. 14 and 16, but at the same time, it recognized that many deserving candidates might be deprived of the opportunity to be considered for appointment if they were not sponsored by the Employment Exchange. The court found that the requirement to notify vacancies to the Employment Exchange was mandatory, but it also held that there was scope for accepting applications directly from candidates who were not sponsored by the Employment Exchange.

Final Decision: The court directed the Registrar (Judicial) of the Court to accept applications directly made by candidates whose names were not sponsored by the Employment Exchange and ordered that Rule 6 of the Rules be amended to bring it in line with the observations made by the apex Court.

JUDGMENT :

A. Pasayat, J. - Petitioner has prayed for a direction to the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to accept applications submitted directly in this Court to be considered for appointment as Junior Assistant in the establishment of the Court. It is stated that insistence is being made on the names being sponsored by Employment Exchanges of the State keeping out of consideration applications made directly.

2. Rule 6 of the Orissa High Court (Appointment of Staff) Rules, 1 63 (in short,'the Rules') is characterised by petitioner to be unreasonable and arbitrary. Reliance Is also placed on the Resolution of the Government of Orissa, Labour and Employment Department dated 7th February, 1990 stating that the need for compulsory sponsoring arrangement by Employment Exchanges in the State in regard to relevant vacancies under the Employment Exchanges (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959 (in short, 'the Act') has undergone amendment and there is no need for the name being sponsored through Employment Exchange.

The learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that the Rules are very clear, and therefore, there is no scope for entertaining any application directly from any applicant.

3. Rule 6 of the Rules reads as follows :

"6. All appointments by direct recruitment in Class !!l service shall be made by notifying the vacancies to the local Employment Exchange :

Provided that such notification will not impose any obligation on the appointing authority to recruit any person through the Employment Exchange to fill any vacancy merely because that vacancy has been notified:

Provided further that failing recruitment through the Employment Exchange either in part or whole the vacancies may be filled up by advertising them in the newspapers and Official Gazette."

On a bare reading of the aforesaid rule, it is clear that appointments by direct recruitment in Class III service are to be made by notifying the vacancies to the local Employment Exchange. The second proviso permits filling up vacancies by advertisement in newspaper and official gazette when recruitment through Employment Exchange has failed.

4. The moot question is whether there is any scope for accepting applications directly not withstanding th9 requirment to notify the vacancies to the Local Employment Exchange. Excluding the candidates who are not sponsored through the medium of Employment Exchange and restricting the choice of selection to the candidates sponsored through the medium of Employment Exchange, would offend the equality clause of Arts. 14 and 16. It is not open to Government to impose restriction on the field of choice. Evan If paper publication is made that may not reach many a handicapped who may be unable to have access to the newspaper. It is to be noted that sponsoring through the medium of Emoloyment Exchange does not violate Arts. 14 and 16. On the other hand, it would advance the rights to the handicapped. But at the same time, realities of life cannot be lost sight of. There may be many candidates who have not been able to sponsor their names, though their names are either registered or are waiting to be registered in the Employment Exchange. They would be deprived of opportunity to be considered with the result that the choice of selection is restricted to only such of the candidates Whose names come to be sponsored by the Employment Exchange. Many a deserving candidates are deprived of the right to be "considered for appointment to a post.Requisitioning authority/establishment has to intimate the Employment Exchange, and the Employment Exchange should sponsor the names of the candidates to the Requisitioning Departments for selection strictly according to seniority and reservation, as per requisition. In addition, the appropriate Department or undertaking or establishment should call for the names by publication in the newspapers having wider circulation and also display on their offices, notice boards or at such other place as deemed prop





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top