SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ori) 252

ARIJIT PASAYAT, A.DEB
MANAS RANJAN DASH – Appellant
Versus
COUNCIL OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pradip Mohanty, B.P. Ray, P.C. Rout and S. Pujhari in OJC No. 5893/96, Jatindra Mohan Mohanty and D. Samal in OJC No. 5272/96, Brahmananda Tripathy and S.K. Rath in OJC No. 5274/96, A.R. Dash, N. Lenka and N. Das in OJC No. 5286/96, Sidheswar Mallik, S.K. Dash and S.L. Kumar in OJC No. 5287/96, K.N. Jena, D.K. Mohapatra and R. Rath in OJC No. 5292/96, Manoj Mishra, U.C. Patnaik, P.K. Das, B. Mishra and P. K. Mohanty In O.C No. 5294/96, B.K. Sahoo and K.C. Sahoo in OJC No. 5306/96, B. P. Das, B.Pr. Das, B.M. Sarangi and D.K. Das in OJC No. 5322 of 1996, S.K. Pattnaik, U.C. Mohanty and A.K. Mohanty in OJC No. 5336 of 1996, R.B. Mohapatra, N.R. Routray, S. Sarkar and S. Sahoo in OJC No. 5371 of 1996, Sanjib Swain and S. Patra in OJC No. 5383 of 1996, S.C. Ghose, S. Ghose and S.L. Ghose in OJC No. 5456 of 1996, Bhimsen Sahoo, in OJC No. 5501/96, D.P. Sarangi, in OJC No. 5503/96, Y. Das, N.C. Mohanty. D.K. Dey, C.R. Satpathy. D. Bhanj and B.P. Mohapatra in OJC No. 5550/96, Sarat Ch. Sahoo, S.K. Sahoo and S.K. Nayak in OJC No. 5571/96 G.P. Mohanty and H.P. Mohanty in OJC No. 5670/96, R.P. Kar, A.N. Ray, N. Paikray, B.P. Mohanty and B.K. Badu in OJC No. 5688/96, D.K. Mohapatra and Minati Misra, in OJC No. 5691 /96, Madan Mohan Das, P.K. Singh and B.D. Pradhan In OJC No. 5771/96, M.S. Panda and M. Satpathy in OJC No. 5772/96, V. Narasingh and J.M. Mohapatra in OJC No. 5833 of 1996, M.K. Mohanty, N.R. Rout and B.P. Routray in OJC No. 5837 of 1996, B.R. Sarangi, in OJC No. 5841 of 1996 and Sameer Kumar Das, R.N. Mishra and M.R. Mishra in OJC No. 5902 of 1996, for the Appellant; S.D. Das, A. Mohanty, L. Samantaray, H.S. Satpathy, B. Patnaik, B.K. Sinha and D. Dhar, S.S. Das and K.C. Swain, B.K. Patnaik, A.K. Mohanty, N. Behuria and D.K. Mohanty, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

A. Pasayat, J. - An examinee goes to an examination hall with lots of expectations, aspirations, hopes and apprehensions. Assessment of knowledge of an examine being the primary object of an examination, apprehensions exist whether preparation is adequate. Examination is essentially the process of testing the knowledge or ability of pupils. Expectations, aspirations and hopes are linked with the result, which would chart out future of the examinee. That is how. an examination has a vital role in the life of a student. Unemployment problems in the country are going up alarmingly. Every student is under constant doubt whether after completion of studentship, he would be left guessing in the cross-roads of uncertainty, which course to adopt, seek a job or pursue higher studies. With demand for seats higher than available seats, stiff competition is faced to get a seat. In the above background, any deficiency in evaluation of answer scripts of an examinee has serious consequences. Recently published results of Annual Higher Secondary (Science) Examination, 1996 conducted by the Council of Higher Secondary Education, Orissa (in short, 'Council') have opened a Pandora's box of













































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top