P.C.NAIK, ARIJIT PASAYAT
NATIONAL TRADING CO. – Appellant
Versus
SALES-TAX OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A. Pasayat, J. - These three writ applications are inter-linked and are disposed of by this common order.
2. The dispute relates to non-grant of refund flowing out of the appellate order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Sales-tax, Cuttack I Range, Cuttack for three periods, i.e., assessment years 1991-92, 1992-93 and 1993-94. Grant of refund was refused purportedly in exercise of power u/s 14-D of the Orissa Sales-tax Act. 1947 (in short, the 'Act').
3. The undisputed position is that the refund of Rs. 1,65,821/-, Rs. 36,513/- and Rs. 14,721/- for the three years respectively flows from the first appellate order. The Sales-tax Officer, Cuttack I East Circle informed the petitioner vide letter dated 22.8.1998 in respect of first two years and vide letter dated 31.7.1996 in respect of the third year (annexed as Annexure-1 to each case) that the Commissioner of Sales-tax had been pleased to withhold the refund till disposal of the second appeals filed by the State u/s 14-D of the Act.
4. According to learned counsel for petitioner, the order is indefensible as the requirements of Section 14-D of the Act have not been complied with. It is submitted by learned counsel for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.