SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ori) 316

ARIJIT PASAYAT, B.P.DAS
HARAPRIYA BARIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


ORDER

A. Pasayat, A.C.J.

1. Petitioner has come to this Court making serious allegations that some persons by making mischievous statements including paper publications have created an impression that she is a victim of sexual exploitation. She has annexed copy of an affidavit to state that there is absolutely no truth in such statement. Role of State Womens' Commission in the matter has been highlighted. The allegations made by the Petitioner if true, constitute very serious matter particularly when credibility of a statutory body i.e. State Womens' Commission is questioned.

2. In this circumstance, we accept the prayer for treating it as a writ petition.

3. The State of Orissa represented by Secretary, Home is impleaded as opposite party No. 1 and the Orissa State Womens' Commission is impleaded as opposite party No. 2.

4. Notice be issued at the cost of the registry.

5. Allegation has been made that by publication of names of alleged sexual victims, result is social harassments and ostracisation. The dignity of a woman as sacroscant and any attempt to defile it may amount to violation of the protection of right to live with dignity given under Article 21 of the Constitution of India,



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top