ARIJIT PASAYAT, B.P.DAS
HARAPRIYA BARIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent
ORDER
A. Pasayat, A.C.J.
1. Petitioner has come to this Court making serious allegations that some persons by making mischievous statements including paper publications have created an impression that she is a victim of sexual exploitation. She has annexed copy of an affidavit to state that there is absolutely no truth in such statement. Role of State Womens' Commission in the matter has been highlighted. The allegations made by the Petitioner if true, constitute very serious matter particularly when credibility of a statutory body i.e. State Womens' Commission is questioned.
2. In this circumstance, we accept the prayer for treating it as a writ petition.
3. The State of Orissa represented by Secretary, Home is impleaded as opposite party No. 1 and the Orissa State Womens' Commission is impleaded as opposite party No. 2.
4. Notice be issued at the cost of the registry.
5. Allegation has been made that by publication of names of alleged sexual victims, result is social harassments and ostracisation. The dignity of a woman as sacroscant and any attempt to defile it may amount to violation of the protection of right to live with dignity given under Article 21 of the Constitution of India,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.