SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Ori) 890

S.R.SINGHARAVELU
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Appellant
Versus
AHALYA PRUSTI – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

S.R. Singharavelu, J. - This appeal u/s 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, a 1987 (for short, "the Act") has been filed by the appellant/respondents against the award of a statutory compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/- passed on 16-8-1996 in O.A. No. 102 of 1995 u/s 13(i)(a)(ii) read with Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, on the allegation that respective husband and father (one individual) of the claimants while travelling in the train as bona fide passenger (206 Down Bhadrak-Kharagpur local train) died on 19-12-1990 when the train involved in an accident at Sabira Railway Station.

2. Upon condoning the delay in filing the original application and also upon perusal of the oral evidence adduced on behalf of the claimants the Tribunal originally had divergent opinion between the members and ultimately the case of the claimants was upheld and compensation was awarded when the matter was subsequently referred to a 3rd judicial member of Secundarabad Bench.

I have heard the learned Counsel of either side on the following question of law besides other points:

(a) Whether Section 124 of the Act is prospective or retrospective in operation?

(b) Whether on the facts and ci









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top