SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Ori) 466

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
V. Gopala Gowda, B.N. Mahapatra, JJ.
KAMALA TADINGI - APPELLANT
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS - RESPONDENT
Writ Petition (C) No. 20023 of 2010
Decided On : 17-05-2011

The central legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the state to ensure the well-being of prisoners in custody, including the provision of adequate medical treatment and the protection of fundamental rights, particularly the right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Headnote:

Custodial Death - Compensation - Article 21, Code of Criminal Procedure - D.K. Basu Vs. State of West Bengal - Chameli Singh and others etc. Vs. State of U.P. - Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay Vs. Dilipkumar Raghavendranath Nadkarni and Others - Olga Tellis and Ors. v. Bombay Municipal Corporation and Ors. - Kapila Hingorani Vs. State of Bihar - D.K.Basu

Fact of the Case:

The widows of two undertrial prisoners filed writ petitions seeking an independent inquiry into the unnatural deaths of their husbands in jail custody, punishment for the responsible authorities, and adequate compensation. The petitioners alleged that their husbands were arrested in good health, but died due to lack of medical treatment and inhuman behavior of the state police personnel. The state authorities claimed to have provided medical treatment and care to the deceased prisoners.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the deceased prisoners died prematurely due to curable diseases and inadequate medical treatment while in jail custody. It held that the state authorities were negligent in their duties and violated the prisoners' right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The court also referred to various legal provisions and precedents emphasizing the protection of fundamental rights, including the right to life, and the obligation of the state to provide minimum necessities of life to prisoners.

Issues: The issues included the circumstances of the prisoners' deaths, the adequacy of medical treatment provided by the state authorities, and the violation of the prisoners' rights while in custody.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the finding that the state authorities failed to provide adequate medical treatment to the deceased prisoners, leading to their premature deaths. The court also relied on legal principles established in cases such as D.K. Basu Vs. State of West Bengal, Chameli Singh and others etc. Vs. State of U.P., and other relevant precedents to emphasize the protection of fundamental rights, including the right to life, and the obligation of the state to ensure the well-being of prisoners in custody.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petitions and directed the state to pay compensation to the widows of the deceased prisoners, emphasizing the state's obligation to provide redress for the established infringement of the prisoners' fundamental right to life. It ordered the payment of Rs. 3,50,000 to each petitioner, with specific instructions for the allocation and disbursement of the compensation.

JUDGMENT :

B.N. Mahapatra, J. - These two writ petitions have been filed by the widows of two undertrial prisoners, namely, Gangula Tadingi and Ratunu Sirika, who died in jail custody praying for a direction to opposite parties to conduct an independent inquiry with regard to unnatural death of their husbands; punish the authorities responsible for such death and award adequate compensation to their families.

2. The case of the Petitioners in a nutshell is that their husbands along with others were arrested in connection with alleged attack by the Chasi Mulia Adivasi Sangha on Narayanpatna Police Station in G.R. Case No. 165 of 2009 of J.M.F.C., Laxmipur. Thereafter, they were sent to Koraput Jail. Prior to arrest, they were in good health and were cultivating forest land to earn their livelihood. The deceased were supporting the cause of Chasi Mulia Adibasi Sangha which was fighting against landlords who had occupied the lands of Adivasis. The Petitioners were never informed about their husbands' illness while in jail custody. They were also not allowed to meet their husbands in jail custody. After coming to know about death of their husbands, there was agitation among the Mahila Sangha of Narayanpatna and they demanded a judicial probe into the custodial death of their husbands. The news regarding death of their husbands was published in the Indian Express on 24.09.2010. The Petitioners, finding No. other alternative remedy, have filed these writ petitions.

3. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners submitted that the deceased were badly beaten up at the time of arrest and were not provided with any medical treatment while in jail custody. As a result, the young and energetic husbands of the Petitioners died untimely due to inhuman behaviour of the State police personnel. He further submitted that the Petitioners belong to below poverty line category and are having No. means to live after the death of their husbands in jail custody. Their children have become helpless. The death of the Petitioners' husbands in jail custody is due to arbitrary, illegal and inhuman attitude of the State Authorities for which they should be punished. The Petitioners are illiterate women belonging to below poverty line and their families were mostly depending upon the income of their husbands. Therefore, learned Counsel prayed for grant of adequate compensation.

4. Per contra, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State Authorities submitted that late Gangula Tadingi, husband of the Petitioner-Kamala Tadingi in W.P.(C) No. 20023 of 2010, died in Tuberculosis in the District Headquarters Hospital, Koraput. Adequate care and medical treatment were provided to the husband of the Petitioner. Deceased-Gangula Tadingi, husband of the Petitioner, was arrested in connection with G.R. Case No. 85 of 2009, G.R. Case No. 86 of 2009 and G.R. Case No. 165 of 2009 and put to jail on 17.12.2009 as per the order of the learned J.M.F.C., Laxmipur. Due to illness, the deceased-Gangula Tadingi was admitted in the Jail Hospital from 30.01.2010 till 07.04.2010 and he was provided with the medical treatment in the Jail Hospital by the Jail Medical Officer. It is further submitted that from 18.02.2010 the medicine for T.B. was administered to him with proper sick diet. On 04.07.2010, he was shifted to District Headquarters Hospital, Koraput as per the advice of the Jail Medical Officer for specialized treatment and he was admitted there. As there was No. road communication and disruption of telephone line due to agitational activities of the Maoists, none of the staff of the Jail could be deputed to his native village to communicate the news of his illness. On 12.04.2010, during the course of treatment at the District Headquarters Hospital, Koraput, the husband of the Petitioner-Kamala Tadingi expired. The Petitioner was intimated by the I.I.C., Narayanapatna Police Station to remain present at the time of inquest and post mortem. The post-
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top