SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ori) 450

S.C.PARIJA
NAKULA SWAIN – Appellant
Versus
RAVI SURESH KU. GUPTA – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

S.C. Parija, J. - Heard learned counsel for the claimants-appellants and learned counsel for the Insurance Company-respondent no. 2. None appears for the owner-respondent no. 1 inspite of service of notice. This appeal by the claimants is directed against the judgment/award dated 10.09.2009, passed by the 3rd Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Puri, in M.A.C. Case No. 150/290 of 2001, awarding an amount of Rs. 1,76,000/- as compensation along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim application, i.e. 21.06.2001, till realization and directing the owner of the vehicle-respondent no. 1 to pay the same.

2. Learned counsel for the claimants submits that as the deceased was working as a Coolie under respondent no. 1 and while sitting on the road inside the factory premises, the vehicle (Truck) bearing No. MH-21/5742 suddenly moved backward without any prior indication and dashed against the deceased, as a result of which he sustained severe injuries and subsequently succumb to the injury. It is submitted that merely because the deceased died in an accident arising out of use of motor vehicle inside the factory premises, learned Tribunal has come to hold th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top