SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ori) 462

R.DASH
HARIBANDHU SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
DAYANIDHI SAHOO – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

R. Dash, J. - This appeal is against the order dated 23.2.2012 passed by the learned District Judge, Puri in R.F.A. No. 78 of 2011 setting aside the judgment and decree of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Puri in C.S. No. 171 of 2010 directing an open remand of the suit to the trial court for fresh disposal. The plaintiff-appellants filed the suit for permanent injunction which was decreed by the learned trial court vide its judgment dated 31.8.2011. The unsuccessful respondent-defendant preferred appeal before the learned District Judge who has passed the impugned order remanding the case to the trial court for fresh disposal after affording opportunity to the parties to bring in necessary amendments in their pleadings and adducing further evidence.

2. Observing that the suit for permanent injunction without seeking for a declaration of title, particularly when the defendant refutes the title of the plaintiff over the suit land, is not maintainable and that the learned trial court under such circumstances should have directed the plaintiffs to amend the plaint in order to cure the defects, the learned appellate court passed the impugned order remanding the case








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top