SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ori) 473

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
C. Nagappan, I. Mahanty, JJ.
PANDAV SAMAL AND TWO OTHERS - APPELLANT
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA AND SIX OTHERS - RESPONDENT
Writ Petition (C) No. 16477 of 2012
Decided On : 20-08-2013

Important Points

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the de-reservation and lease of communal land for industrial purposes must be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Orissa Government Land Settlement Act, 1962, and the legal powers of relevant authorities in granting consent and leasing of land for industrial purposes.

Subject

Land Law - De-reservation of Land for Industrial Purposes

Headnote

Public Interest Litigation - Land De-reservation - Orissa Government Land Settlement Act, 1962 - Section 3A, Rule 4 - The court discussed the provisions of the Orissa Government Land Settlement Act, 1962, particularly Section 3A and Rule 4, and emphasized the procedure for de-reservation of government land reserved as gochar. The court also highlighted the legal powers of the Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation and the State Pollution Control Board in granting consent and leasing of land for industrial purposes.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order of de-reservation of communal land for industrial purposes and alleged that the de-reservation was illegal and against the provisions of the Orissa Government Land Settlement Act, 1962.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the de-reservation of the land and its subsequent lease for industrial purposes were conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Orissa Government Land Settlement Act, 1962, and the actions of the Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation and the State Pollution Control Board were lawful.

Issues: The main issue was whether the de-reservation and lease of communal land for industrial purposes were conducted in accordance with the law.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the de-reservation and lease of the land were conducted following the due procedure stipulated under the Orissa Government Land Settlement Act, 1962, and the actions of the Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation and the State Pollution Control Board were within their legal powers.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.

Advocates Appeared:
Asim Amitav Das, Mr. Deepak Kumar, Mr. P.K. Mishra and D. Dash, for the Appellant; Asok Mahanty, Advocate General, (for O.P. Nos. 1 to 4), S.P. Mohanty and M. Barik (for O.P. No 5), Mr. J. Patnaik, B. Mohanty, T.K. Patnaik, A. Patnaik, Soma Patnaik, R.P. Ray and B.S. Rayaguru (for O.P. No. 6), Mr. J. Das, Mr. Aditya Narayan Das, N. Sarkar, K.P. Mishra and E.A. Das (for O.P. No. 7), for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

C. Nagappan, C.J. - Petitioners, claiming to be the inhabitants of village Kolathapangi have filed this writ petition by way of Public Interest Litigation seeking to quash the order of the Collector-opp. Party No. 3 dated 19.01.2011 under Annexure-5 de-reserving the lands measuring Ac.36.10 dec. under Khata No. 116 corresponding to plot No. 167 (part) in Mouza Kolathapangi; and further sought for declaration that the allotment of the said land in favour of O.P. No. 7-Company is illegal. Briefly, the case of the petitioners is that the O.P. No. 7-Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. signed an MOU with the State Government, namely, opposite party No. 1 on 10.11.2006 for establishment of 1.5 MTPA Split Cement Grinding Unit at Khamara Nuagaon and Kolathapangi under Athagarh Tahsil in the district of Cuttack with project cost of Rs. 300 Crores. The Industrial Promotion and Investment Corporation of Orissa Ltd. (IPICOL) vide letter dated 09.06.2010 recommended IDCO-O.P. No. 6 that Ac.90.00 of land at the said villages may be alienated in favour of O.P. No. 7 for establishment of the 1.5 MTPA Split cement grinding unit. Pursuant to said recommendation, O.P. No. 6-IDCO made requisition for alienation of government land measuring Ac.36.100 in village Kolathapangi vide letter No. 17611 dated 26.08.2010 for the purpose of establishment of the said industry. Thereafter, O.P. No. 4 initiated a de-reservation case vide Lease Misc. Case No. 4/2010 under the provisions of Orissa Government Land Settlement Act, 1962 (in short "the OGLS Act") to de-reserve the said land and invited public objections by issuing proclamation. According to the petitioners, they along with some other co-villagers filed their written objection stating that cattle and livestock used to graze in the said Gochar land, the said land is also used by the villagers for organizing various social functions, the youth and the children of the village are also using the said land as play ground, and further setting up of the said industry will lead to environmental problems. On 08.12.2010 personal hearing as well as spot inspection was conducted by the Tahsildar, Athagarh-O.P. No. 4 and after completion of the necessary formalities, the O.P. No. 4 overruling the objections, vide letter dated 18.12.2010 recommended the O.P. No. 3 that the subject land be de-reserved. The Collector-O.P. No. 3 by order dated 19.01.2011 accepted the recommendation of the Tahsildar and directed for de-reservation of the said land in exercise of power u/s 3A of the OGLS Act read with Rule 4 of the OGLS Rules, 1983 and sanctioned release of the said land in favour of IDCO and thereafter sanction order was issued. According to the petitioners, during pendency of the Lease Misc. Case No. 4/2010, they along with their co-villagers approached the O.P. No. 2 by way of a representation dated 10.11.2010 stating that their case was not heard in proper manner and their objections were not appreciated properly. On receipt of the said representation, the O.P. No. 2 directed the Collector, Cuttack-O.P. No. 3 to look into the matter, however, the said direction of O.P. No. 2 was not complied with.

In the meanwhile, lease deed was executed between the Collector, Cuttack and IDCO for transfer of 36.100 acres of land in village Kolathapangi on 18.07.2011 and subsequently the IDCO-O.P. No. 6 allotted the said extent of land in favour of O.P. No. 7-Company vide letter dated 8.8.2011 for establishment of the said industry and accordingly lease deed also came to be executed on 19.8.2011 between the IDCO and O.P. No. 7. It is also stated by the petitioners that the State Pollution Control Board (SPCB), namely, O.P. No. 5 has granted consent to O.P. No. 7 for setting up of a Bulk Terminal of capacity 2.0 MTPA under the relevant provisions of Acts.

2. Petitioners have stated that the subject land is a communal land and has been kept reserved for common use of villagers and there is no specific provision for de-reservation of such















1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top