BISWANATH RATH
RAJ KUMAR AGARWALLA – Appellant
Versus
KADAMBINI PRADHAN – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Biswanath Rath, J. - All these three writ applications have been filed by three writ petitioners involved herein assailing the impugned order at Annexure-13 passed by the Joint Commissioner, Settlement and Consolidation involving Revision Case Nos.754/1988, 365/95 and 366/95 disposed of in a common order in exercise of revisional power under Section 36 of the OCH & PFL Act, 1972. All the three cases though involved common facts and common question of law were heard separately by the appellate forum and disposed of by separate judgments. But however, the three Revisions though instituted involving disposal of three Appeals independently but were heard and disposed of by the revisional forum in the common impugned order giving rise to three writ petitions involved herein. For the involvement of common facts and common dispute, on consent of all the parties, all these three writ petitions are herein taken up together and decided by this common judgment. To avoid confusion, this Court takes a concise brief of facts involving the cases which read as follows :-
2. Objection Case No.2139/1280 involved in Consolidation Appeal Case No.117/84 (against Kadambini Pradhan) and ended in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.