SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Ori) 112

R.N.MISRA
SILLA NARAYANAMURTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K. Misra, for the Appellant; Govt. Advocate and Standing Counsel, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

R.N. Misra, J. - Petitioner was convicted u/s 7 of the Essential Commodities Act of 1955 on the allegation that there was violation of Clause 10 of the Orissa Baby Food Licensing Order, 1966. The trying Magistrate sentenced him to four months' rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 5001- or in default, directed further rigorous imprisonment for three weeks more. He also directed confiscation of the seized baby food. On appeal, the learned Additional Sessions Judge affirmed the conviction and sentenced but vacated the direction for confiscation of Lactodex and Lactogen.

2. Mr. Misra for the Petitioner raises several contentions in support of the revision application, but it is unnecessary to deal with all of them, as in my opinion, the application has to succeed on a preliminary ground. Orissa Baby Food Licencing Order, 1966 came into force in August, 1966. 'Baby food' has been defined in Clause 2(i) to mean 'a food as specified in Schedule 1'. Schedule I originally contained 7 Items being (1) Amul milk food for babies, (2) Cenac baby food, (3) Glaxo, (4) Horlicks, (5) Lactogen, (6) Lactodex and (7) Oster milk. In the instant case, the prosecution is for Amul Spray




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top