SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Ori) 155

J.K.MOHANTY
BINOD BIHARI BEHERA – Appellant
Versus
NIRANJAN SAHU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.C. Ram, for the Appellant; R.C. Patnaik and P.K. Misra, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

J.K. Mohanty, J. - Niranjan Sahu, opposite party in this revision, lodged an information at Tangi Police Station (Tangi P.S. Case No. 75/76) on 31-5-1976 at 6.00 p.m. with reward to an occurrence of the same day against the Petitioners and some others. Police, after investigation, submitted charge-sheet under Sections 147, 323 and 324. Indian Penal Code against the Petitioners and a case was registered as G.R. Case No. 394 of 1976 The Magistrate took cognizance of the offences on 29-10-1976.

Thereafter the copies of the police papers were supplied to the accused persons and the case was taken up for consideration of the changes on 3-6-1977. On that day the learned Magistrate heard the defence counsel, who submitted that the copies of the police papers supplied to him do not disclose any case against the accused persons and prayed for discharge of the accused persons. The learned Magistrate heard the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, who appeared on behalf of the prosecution, and passed the following order:

Perused the Case Diary. The case .diary reveals that except the statement of Niranjan Sahu, the informant himself, no other statements of other witnesses is recorded b











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top