SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Ori) 99

BARMAN
LABANYA DEBI – Appellant
Versus
GOBINDA MALIK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K. Mohanty, for the Appellant; M.G.G. Das, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

Barman, J. - In this civil revision, the Defendants Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 are the Petitioners in revision, directed against an order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Dhenkanal, in T. Section No. 32 of 1955 rejecting the objections filed by the said Defendants who are the Petitioners in the present application and accepting the report of the Commissioner appointed in the said suit.

2. The dispute arose out of an alleged mistaken identity of certain plots of land, due to be delivered to one Gobinda Malik in execution of a decree in a partition suit filed by him, with certain other plots presumably due to confusion of the successive Commissioners appointed in this connection as hereinafter fully discussed, The matter arose in these circumstances: In 1951 Gobinda Malik filed a suit being suit No. 39 of 1951 against Pitabas Mohanty and Purastam Mohanty being Petitioner No. 3 herein for partition of plot No. 14/520 with an area of 305 acres and plot No. 14/523 with an area 0'77 decimals in Mouza Jankhira. There was a decree for partition in the said suit. In execution of the said decree in Execution Case No. 14 of 1953 for delivery of possession, the Commissioner, appointed therei






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top