P.K.MISRA
BRUNDABAN SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
ANTARYAMI SAHOO – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P.K. Misra, J. - This writ application is directed against the order under Annexure-8 passed by the Land Reforms Commissioner-cum-Settlement Commissioner, Orissa, Cuttack (in short, the "Commissioner").It appears that present opposite party No. 1 had filed Settlement Revision Case No. 4 of 1997 in the Court of the Commissioner and after hearing both parties, the revision was dismissed by order dated 12-5-1998. Thereafter,present opposite party No. 1 filed Misc. Case No. 53 of 1998 for recalling the order dated 12-5-1998 and the Commissioner has recalled the earlier order and allowed the revision of present opposite party No. 1. as per order under Annexure-8. Such order is being impugned on the ground that the Commissioner did not have any jurisdiction to entertain an application for review.
2. Learned Counsel appearing for opposite party No. 1 submitted that every Court or tribunal has got inherent power to recall its earlier decision and as such it cannot be said that order under Annexure-8 is without jurisdiction.
3. Law is well settled that power of review of earlier judicial or quasi judicial order can be exercised only if there is a specific provision contained in the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.