SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ori) 471

L.MOHAPATRA
BODALA RAVANMMA – Appellant
Versus
ESURU SRIRAMULU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.S. Rao, for the Appellant; Sanju Panda, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

L. Mohapatra, J. - Plaintiff No. 1 is the appellant before this Court against a reversing judgment. The Suit was filed for declaration of plaintiffs title and possession over the suit schedule property and for declaration that the plaintiffs are entitled to take possession of the suit schedule lands from the receiver appointed by the Executive Magistrate. Originally the present appellant had filed this suit and later on by order dated 8.4.1980 the mother of the appellant was added as plaintiff No. 2.

2. Case of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff No. 1 is the owner in possession of the suit schedule property and the plaintiff No. 2 as the mother of plaintiff No. 1 had gifted the suit schedule property to her in the year 1975. After execution of the gift deed the plaintiff No. 1 raised crops over the suit lands but the defendants threatened to remove paddy crops for which the plaintiff No. 1 initiated a proceeding u/s 144, Cr.P.C. in the Court of the Executive Magistrate which was subsequently converted to a proceeding u/s 146, Cr.P.C. and the land was attached. After attachment of the land the Executive Magistrate directed the parties to establish their rights over the sui


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top