SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Ori) 86

PANIGRAHI
KISHORI JENA – Appellant
Versus
RUPA JENA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. De, for the Appellant; R.N. Sinha, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

Panigrahi, J. - This appeal arises out of a simple suit for declaration of title to and possession of lands appertaining to Khata 46 in Mouza Kuarnpur, after setting aside the rent sale in favour of defendant 1, Rupa Jena. The plaintiffs' case was that the suit properties were jointly recorded in the names of their father, Bichhanda and their uncles Dukhei (pro forma defendant 3) and Arts (pro forma defendant No. 4). Bichhanda and Dukhei were uterine brothers and Arts was their first cousin. Defendant 2, Motilal Pandit, is the landlord of the holding and defendant 1 is the auction-purchaser who purchased the property in execution of a rent decree in suit No. 1794 of 1938-39 on 22-12-39 and took delivery of possession through Court on 15-9-1941.

The plaintiffs' case was that defendant 2 obtained a rent decree fraudulently on 20-8-1938 against the plaintiffs and their deceased brother, Ghasuri at a time when the plaintiffs were minors and Ghasuri was already dead. They also pleaded that Dukhei and Arts, pro forma defendants 3 and 4 had not been served with summons. They further alleged that the decree itself was a nullity as the suit had been filed in the name of Ganesh Lal






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top