R.N.MISRA
MAHENDRA KUMAR PATNAIK – Appellant
Versus
NILARNANI PRADHAN – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.N. Misra, C.J. - The Plaintiff of Money Suit No. 241 of 1976 who lodged a claim for recovery of Rs. 1400/- based on a promissory note dated 11-2-1973 is the Petitioner challenging an order directing abatement of his suit for non-compliance of the provision of Section 18-B of the Orissa Money Lenders Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). The suit was filed on 10-8-1976, some time after the amendment came into the Statute. The trial Court granted specific adjournments to the Plaintiff to comply with the mandate of Section 18-B of the Act. After two such adjournments, the suit stood posted to 4-4-1977 when the following order was made:
The Plaintiff and Defendant file separate haziras, but the Plaintiff does not file the required certificate u/s 18-B of the amended Orissa Money Lenders Act. The Plaintiff is absent on call. The suit stands abated u/s 18-B(1) of the Orissa Money Lenders Act for want of the certificate u/s 18-B.
The order for abatement must be assumed to have been u/s 18-B(8) of the Act though erroneously referred to in the order-sheet as 'Sub-section (7).'
2. An application was made for revival of the suit by filing it on 1-5-1978, i.e. about 13 months af
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.