SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ori) 320

P.C.MISRA, G.B.PATNAIK
BRUNDABAN PADHAN – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA PADHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B. Pal and A. Mohanty, for the Appellant; Y.S.N. Murty, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

P.C. Misra, J. - The defendants in Title Suit No. 77 of the 1971 of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Aska, are the appellants in this appeal. The suit is one for partition of the suit properties described in the plaint schedule into two equal shares and fox allotment of one of such share to the plaintiff.

2. The admitted genealogy showing the relationship amongst the parties is given below for the better appreciation of the cases of the respective parties:

Sridhar ' Sindhu Padhan

|

_____________________________________________

| |

Brundaban (D. 1) Natha

-Kautiki (D. 5) |

|

_________________________________ 3 Krishna (Plff.)

| | |

Ramachandra Hari Charan

(D.2) (D.3) (D.4)

The above genealogy would show that the plaintiff represents the branch of Natha whereas the defendants represent the branch of Brundaban. The plaintiff's case is that Natha and Brundaban were members of a Hindu joint family and the plaintiff's father Natha died in a state of jointness at an early age. The plaintiff was an infant at the time of the death of his father who was being looked after by his uncle Brundaban. It is alleged that Brundaban-defendant No.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top