SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ori) 239

K.P.MOHAPATRA, D.P.MOHAPATRA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
KALIPADA GHOSE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.B. Roy and D.K. Mohapaira, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

D.P. Mohapatra, J. - On the applications filed by the Revenue u/s 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, this court directed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to state a case and refer the following question for opinion of the court:

" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, where the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had dismissed the appeal for non-compliance of Section 249(4) of the Act, his order amounted to one within the ambit of Section 250 of the Act so as to be subjected to second appeal before the Tribunal u/s 253 of the Act ? "

2. Accordingly, the aforesaid question of law has been referred by the Tribunal for the opinion of this court. The gist of the relevant facts may be stated as follows:

The assessee, Kalipada Ghose, was the proprietor of New Ganguram Sweets at Bhubaneswar. The assessment years involved are 1974-75 and 1975-76. The Income Tax Officer determined the total income of the asses-see at Rs. 17,500 and Rs. 30,000, respectively, for these years. The assessee filed appeals on October 29, 1975. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner considering the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975, under which a new provision in Section 249 was introdu












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top