L.RATH
BHAIGA PRADHAN – Appellant
Versus
ISWAR ADHIKARI – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
L. Rath, J. - The appellants who were respectively defendants 1 and 2 in the suit have preferred this appeal against the confirming judgment of the Additional District Judge, Canjam-Boudh decreeing the plaintiff's suit so far as item No. 2 of the suit scheduled properties are concerned. The suit was instituted by Iswar Adhikari who having died has been substituted by respondent Nos. 1/a to 1/i. Appellant No. 2 has been deleted from being a party by order No. 16 dated 17-4-1985 passed in Misc. Case No. 44/85. The respondent No. 1 who was the plaintiff in the trial Court instituted the suit for two Items of properties for relief that the judgment of the Executive Magistrate, Chatrapur, u/s 145, Cr. P. C. in M C No. 65/78 in respect of item No. 1 of the suit property is not binding upon him and for recovery of possession so far as both item Nos. 1 & 2 of the suit properties are concerned. The suit was dismissed with regard to item No. 1 of the suit property. So far as item No. 2 of the suit property is concerned, the plaintiff's case is that S. No. 47/3 was Banjar land in the ex Estate of Khalikote and that on 3-7-1950 he got a Banjar Patta in respect of that property. i.e..
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.