SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ori) 285

L.RATH
BHAIGA PRADHAN – Appellant
Versus
ISWAR ADHIKARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sarat Kumar Mohanty, for the Appellant; Manoj Misra, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

L. Rath, J. - The appellants who were respectively defendants 1 and 2 in the suit have preferred this appeal against the confirming judgment of the Additional District Judge, Canjam-Boudh decreeing the plaintiff's suit so far as item No. 2 of the suit scheduled properties are concerned. The suit was instituted by Iswar Adhikari who having died has been substituted by respondent Nos. 1/a to 1/i. Appellant No. 2 has been deleted from being a party by order No. 16 dated 17-4-1985 passed in Misc. Case No. 44/85. The respondent No. 1 who was the plaintiff in the trial Court instituted the suit for two Items of properties for relief that the judgment of the Executive Magistrate, Chatrapur, u/s 145, Cr. P. C. in M C No. 65/78 in respect of item No. 1 of the suit property is not binding upon him and for recovery of possession so far as both item Nos. 1 & 2 of the suit properties are concerned. The suit was dismissed with regard to item No. 1 of the suit property. So far as item No. 2 of the suit property is concerned, the plaintiff's case is that S. No. 47/3 was Banjar land in the ex Estate of Khalikote and that on 3-7-1950 he got a Banjar Patta in respect of that property. i.e..






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top