SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ori) 345

B.K.BEHERA
BIJAYA KUMAR PATNAIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Indrajit Ray, for the Appellant; Sanjit Mohanty, Amicus Curaie, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

B.K. Behera, J. - The convict Bijaya Kumar Patnaik has made an application in this Court for an order u/s 427 of the Code of Criminal Procedure so that the sentences of imprisonment passed against him in C. R. Case Nos. 12 and 13 of 1983 by Mr. S. K. Panda, judicial Magistrate, First Class, Berhampur, and maintained by Mr. S. K. Patel, Additional Sessions Judge, Berhampur, in Jail Criminal Appeal No.,1 of 1985 ( 147 of 1984-GDC ) and Jail Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 1985 (148 of 1984-GDC) would run concurrently. In each of the two cases, he has been convicted under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code ('the Code', for short) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years in respect of both the offences which were to run concurrently and in addition, sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 250/-for each of the two offences and in default of payment thereof, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two months. The convict seeks an order that the sentences of imprisonment passed in both the cases should run concurrently. While examining the records, it came to my notice that the orders of conviction recorded against the convict in both the case










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top