IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
N. Prusty, I.M. Quddusl, JJ.
LAXMIDHAR TRIPATHY - APPELLANT
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS - RESPONDENT
Writ Petition (C) No. 5164 of 2006
Decided On : 22-12-2006
Misappropriation - Removal of Chairman, Nayagarh Panchayat Samiti - Orissa Grama Panchayat Act, Section 40-A
Fact of the Case:
The Writ Petition challenges the removal of the Petitioner from the office of Chairman, Nayagarh Panchayat Samiti by the State Government based on allegations of misappropriation of funds and irregularities in conducting meetings.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the State Government's decision to remove the Petitioner was not sustainable as no proper inquiry was conducted, and the Petitioner was not given a reasonable opportunity to be heard, violating the principles of natural justice.
Issues: The main issues revolved around the removal of the Petitioner from office based on allegations of misappropriation and irregularities, and the lack of a proper inquiry and opportunity to be heard.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity to be heard before making a decision with far-reaching civil consequences, as mandated by Section 40-A of the Orissa Grama Panchayat Act. It also highlighted the principles of natural justice, including the right to be informed about charges, submit explanations, adduce evidence, and be heard in person.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was allowed, quashing the impugned order of removal, but leaving it open for the State Government to proceed against the Petitioner in accordance with the law and observations made by the Court. The Petitioner was prohibited from exercising financial powers until the completion of the inquiry by the State Government.
JUDGMENT :
I.M. Quddusi, J. - This Writ Petition is directed against the impugned Order dated 30.03.2006 passed by the State Government removing the Petitioner from the office of Chairman, Nayagarh Panchayat Samiti.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the Petitioner was elected as Chairman of Nayagarh Panchayat Samiti in the last election held on 11.3.2002. A representation was made by on Sagarika Rath?Member, Nayagarh Panchayat Samiti alleging misappropriation of Panchayat Samiti funds by its Chairman(Petitioner) vis-a-vis non execution of developmental works. Since her representation was not considered, she filed a Writ Petition W.P.(C) No. 12999 of 2004 in this Court which was disposed of vide Order dated 17.12.2004 with a direction to the Secretary to Government of Orissa in Panchayati Raj (G.P.)"Department, Bhubaneswar to take a final decision on the aforesaid representation within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of that order. Thereafter, vide Order dated 4.2.2005 the Deputy Secretary to Government intimated the Petitioner as well as Sagarika Rath (complaint) to appear before the Commissioner-cum?Secretary to Government, Panchayati Raj Department for personal hearing on 7.2.2005 at 1.00 P.M. but the same was adjourned to 31.3.2005 at 11.00 A.M. on which date the Petitioner sought four weeks time to appear before the Commissioner. On 8.4.2005, a charge memo was issued by the State Government along with an order to show cause within thirty days. In the charge memo, the charges were levelled against the Petitioner showing that in the action plan for the year 2002-2003 a sum of Rs. l.00 lakh was initially approved for renovation of Parbati Sagar (Tank)) at Baunsiapada. Later on the project cost was enhanced to Rs. 1.50 lakhs by District Planning Officer vide letter dated 4.6.2003. As per recommendation of Palli Sabha, work order was issued in favour of one Laxmidhar Sarangi, son of Chandramani Sarangi of village Baunsiapada. On verification of the voters list, it was found that no such person named Laxmidhar Sarangi was there. The case record reveals that Palli Sabha selected the name of Shri Laxmidhar Tripathy which was subsequently changed as Laxmidhar Sarangi through manipulation by the Chairman. Further Laxmidhar Tripathy, the Chairman, in the name of Laxmidhar Sarangi, executed the project namely, "Renovatioin of Parbati Sagar" at Baunsiapada at a cost of Rs. 1.50 lakhs and final payment was received by him on 10.10.2003. Thus he has acted as an executant for the Panchayat Samiti himself as the Chairman by changing his surname from Tripathy to Sarangi.
3. Further the next charge was that the meeting of Panchayat Samiti had been held in a very irregular manner. Instead of holding six meetings in a year only three meetings were held during calendar year 2003. Similarly, only three meetings were held during calendar year 2004. The records produced by the Learned Addl. Government Advocate indicate that in the meantime the Superintendent of Police, Vigilance, Bhubaneswar has intimated vide his letter dated 13.12.2004 addressed to the Director, Panchayati Raj that the Bhubaneswar Vigilance P.S. Case No. 37 of 2004, dated 9.12.2004 u/s 13(1), 13(1) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and under Sections 467, 468, 477, 167, and 472 Indian Penal Code has been registered against the Petitioner and the case is under investigation.
4. In respect of charge memo issued by the Government to the Petitioner, the Petitioner demanded copies of certain documents, i.e., Panchayat Samiti resolution book for the years 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, Panchayat Samiti meeting me, copies of all letters of district administration regarding non?convening of the Panchayat Samiti meeting during Assembly Session, sanction letter of District Planning Officer dated 4.6.2003, annual action plan for the years 2002-03 and 2003-04, original Palli Sabha book of Baunsiapada Grama Panchayat for the years 2002-03, 2003-04 and copies
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.