SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ori) 767

S.PANDA
TIKAYAT ROUTRAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sangam Kumar Sahoo, for the Appellant; Suraj Mohanty, A.S.C., for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

S. Panda, J. - The Petitioners have filed this application u/s 482 Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the Order Dated 17.02.2009 passed by the Learned J.M.F.C., Kendrapara in G.R. Case No. 116 of 1995 rejecting the petition filed by them to recall the prosecution witnesses 1 to 5 & posting the case for accused statement.

2. From the records it appears that the Investigating Officer was examined on 6.8.2008 & on that date he was not cross-examined by the defence. The Learned J.M.F.C. passed an order on 3.10.2008 to recall the I.O. for cross-examination fixing the case to 3.11.2008 for evidence. The said I.O. was not present in the Court on the said date. Again he issued summons fixing the date to 26.12.2008. On 26.12.2008 the case was also adjourned. Thereafter, the case was adjourned on 2 to 3 occasions. Finally, on 17.02.2009 the Learned J.M.F.C. closed the evidence of the prosecution & posted the case to 20.02.2009 for accused statement.

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submitted that though Petitioners filed an application u/s 311 Code of Criminal Procedure to recall the I.O., the Learned J.M.F.C. rejected the said application without giving an opportunity of c





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top