SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ori) 651

A.K.RATH
ABHIMANYU NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
BASANTA MOHANTY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. D.P. Mohanty, Advocate, for the Opposite Parties; Mr. Soumya Mishra, Advocate, for the Petitioners

JUDGMENT :

Dr. A.K. Rath, J. - In this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge is made to the order dated 22.9.2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr.Division), Anandapur in C.S.No.43 of 2006. By the said order, the learned trial court rejected the application of the plaintiffs to amend the plaint under Order 6, Rule 17 C.P.C. to implead the State of Odisha as defendant on the ground inter alia that prior notice under Section 80(1) C.P.C. has not been issued to the State of Odisha.

2. The petitioners as plaintiffs instituted a suit for permanent injunction impleading the opposite parties as defendants in the court of the learned Civil Judge (Jr.Division), Anandapur, which is registered as C.S.No.43 of 2006. During pendency of the suit, the plaintiffs filed an application for amendment of the plaint. In the proposed amendment no.1, the plaintiffs sought to incorporate the fact of amalgamation of certain areas of the suit plot in another plot belonging to the Government. In the proposed amendment no.2, the plaintiffs sought to introduce the new prayer for declaration of right, title and interest in respect of the property, which stood recorded in the name


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top