SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ori) 659

A.K.RATH
GOPAL MALLIK & ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
GHASI MALLIK & OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Budhiram Das, Advocate, for the Appellant; None appears, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

Dr. A.K. Rath, J. - Assailing the order dated 4.2.2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Balangir in C.S No.29 of 2004, the instant petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. By the said order, the learned trial court rejected the application of the defendants to stay further proceeding of the suit till disposal of Jhankri Case No.51 of 1994 pending before the Tahasildar, Tusura.

2. Satya Mallik predecessor-in-interest of the opposite parties as plaintiffs laid C.S. No.29 of 2004 in the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Balangir for permanent injunction impleading the present petitioners as defendants. Pursuant to issuance of summons, defendants entered appearance and filed written statement denying the assertions made in the plaint. While the matter stood thus, the defendants filed an application to stay further proceedings of the suit till disposal of Jhankri Case No.51 of 1994 pending before the Tahasildar, Tusura. It is stated that the plaintiff has filed a case claiming Jhankar of village Chantimunda. He was performing Seva Puja of the deity. The suit land was allotted to him in Jhankri Case No.912 of 1965-










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top