JUDGMENT :

C.R. Dash, J. - Above noted three writ petitions arise out of I.D. Misc. Case No. 23 of 2006, I.D. Misc. Case No. 2 of 2008 and I.D. Misc. Case No. 7 of 2011 respectively. All the aforesaid I.D. Misc. Cases are proceedings under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ("I.D. Act" for short) relating to different periods, as claimed by the present opposite party workman. As the proceedings are between the same parties and involve same facts and questions of law, they are taken up together for disposal by this common order.

2. In all the I.D. Misc. Cases under Section 33C(2) of the I.D. Act the present opposite party workman had prayed to determine his dues relating to salary, etc. against the employer Management on the basis of the award passed by the Labour Court on 31.03.1999 in I.D. Case No. 9 of 1997.

3. The brief facts relevant for disposal of these writ petitions are as follows:--

"The present opposite party workman, while working as a Senior Laboratory Technician under the petitioner Management, was terminated from service on 16.04.1996. He raised an Industrial Dispute before the District Labour Officer, Rourkela, which ended in submission of a Failure Repo