SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ori) 465

J.M.MAHAPATRA
FAKIRA CHANDRA PANDA – Appellant
Versus
SATRUGHNA BEHERA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Rao, for the Appellant; Sanju Panda, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

J.M. Mahapatra, J. - The revision is directed agains the judgment and order dated, 26-7-1986 of the learned Second Additional Sessions judge, Cuttack allowing the appeal and acquitting the opposite parties of the offences' Under Sections 436, 427, 447 and 379, I, P. C.

2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that on 3. 5. 1983 at about 10'. Clock in the night the opposite parties went in a group to the house of the informant, P. W. 1, called him from out side to come out. As the informant, P. W. 1, did not come out they pelted brickbats and stones to the tiled and asbestos roof of his' house which were consequently damaged. The opposite parties are also alleged to have set fire to the thatched roof of his house and to have entered into the bari of the informant by breaking open the fence and removing the bullock cart therefrom. After the fire was extinguished, P. W. 1 lodged F. I. R. Ext 1 at Baramba police station at 10. 45 A. M. on 4-5-1933. A case was registered, investigation followed and eventually charge sheet Under Sections 447/436/427 and 379, I. P. C. read with Section 34 I. P. C was placed against the opposite parties.

3. The plea of all the opposite parties at






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top