SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ori) 229

K.C.JAGADEB ROY, A.K.PADHI
LABANYABATI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J. Patnaik, for the Appellant; Additional Standing Counsel (1-3), for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Padhi, J. - Challenging the order of the Member, Board of Revenue, Orissa, Cuttack exercising his jurisdiction u/s 39(2) of the Orissa Land Reforms Act, I960 hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the petitioners have filed this writ application.

2. In the writ application, it has been averred that a suo matu proceeding was initiated against the two brothers Bamadev Satpathy and Durga Charan Satpathy sons of late Bholanath Satpathy. By the time of initiation of the proceeding the father of the petitioners was dead. Both the petitioners had filed written statements taking the stand that both the brothers were separated from each other in mess and property since 30 years and they do not constitute one family. The further stand of the petitioners was that they did not have property beyond the ceiling unit permitted under the Act.

3. After considering the written statements of the petitioners in O. L. R. Case No. 608 of 1975 by order dated 29-11-1975 the competent authority held that the land holders did trot possess land more than the ceiling area and, therefore, dropped the proceeding. Against this order dated 29-11 1975 no appeal was filed.

4. On being moved by the Colle


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top