SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Ori) 225

MISRA
BIBHUTI BHUSAN MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
DINAMANI DEI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.C. Patnaik, for the Appellant; D.P. Sahoo, A.K. Mohanty and A.K. Padhy, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

Misra, C.J. - This appeal by the employer u/s 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act calls in question the order dated September 9, 1980, passed by the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, Puri, in a claim laid by respondent No. 1.

2. One Pramod Kumar Mohanty, aged about 22 years, was employed by the appellant, a bus operator, as a cleaner in a stage carriage bus bearing No. ORP 3215 of which he was the owner. The said bus was operating between Puri and Konark and had been duly insured with the National Insurance Co. Ltd. (respondent No. 2). On June 4, 1977, Promod was travelling in the said bus and was performing the duties of a cleaner. Immediately following a jerk of the vehicle on the road, the side door of the bus opened and the cleaner was thrown out. He sustained severe injuries, became unconscious and, ultimately, succumbed to the injuries in the afternoon of that day. Claim was laid by respondent No. 1, the widowed mother of the deceased, impleading the employer as also the insurer.

3. The employer did not dispute that the workman was engaged as cleaner at the relevant time, nor was there any dispute that death occurred in the course of employment. It was, however, p














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top