SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Ori) 233

R.N.MISRA, B.N.MISRA
PRAKASH KAUR – Appellant
Versus
CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A. Pasayat, for the Appellant;

JUDGMENT :

R.N. Misra, C.J. - Upon the assessee's application u/s 64(2) of the E.D. Act, 1953, this court by order dated January 11,1979, called upon the Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, to state a case and refer the following questions for the opinion of the court:

(i) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the inclusion of the value of the house property at Rourkela is legal, even though the title to the land was defective and the property was not free from encumbrances?

(ii) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in fixing the valuation of the property at a multiple of 13 times the net rental, even though, admittedly, the department had fixed the valuation at a much lower figure for the purpose of wealth-tax?

One Joginder Singh along with Jai Singh took a lease of certain lands located at Rourkela from Birabar Naik and others who happened to be members of the Scheduled Tribes and the lease was for a term of 99 years. Smt. Prakash Kaur purchased a portion out of the leasehold from Joginder Singh during her lifetime and constructed a building on the said property between 1966


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top