SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ori) 371

D.P.MOHAPATRA
GOURANGA CHARAN SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
MAHESH CHHAPOLIA AND COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Samareswar Mohanty, for the Appellant; P.K. Patnaik, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

D.P. Mohapatra, J. - This application u/s 115 of the CPC arises out of a proceeding under the Arbitration Act. By the impugned order the Subordinate Judge rejected the Petitioner's application for amendment of his objection filed in the proceeding (T.S. No. 252/81).

2. On a reference of disputes by opposite party to an Arbitrator an ex parte order was passed against the Petitioner making him liable for a sum of Rs. 25,810/-. An application to make the said award rule of court was filed by the opposite party which is subject matter of T.S. No. 252/81. Therein the Petitioner filed his objection within the stipulated period challenging the award on several grounds. He asserted that he had no transaction with the opposite party which could possibly give rise to a dispute necessitating reference by the latter. He also denied existence of any arbitration agreement between the parties. The matter is pending consideration before the court. By the proposed amendment the Petitioner sought leave to introduce the following averments in his objection:

After para 9, add the following para 9A: That the arbitrator Shri Suresh Chandra Mohanty has acted and appeared as an Advocate for the Pl






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top