SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ori) 389

L.RATH, G.B.PATNAIK
MOTWALI SK. KAUSAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K. Misra and N.C. Pati, for the Appellant; R.N. Panigrahi and Mira Ghose, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

G.B. Pattnaik, J. - In this writ petition, the petitioners question the legality of the order of opposite party No. 4 dated 20-2-1978, annexed as Annexure-5, by which order he reviewed his earlier order dated 5-4-1977 and also the legality of the order dated 12-10-1982 passed by the Member, Board of Revenue, in exercise of his power u/s 38-B of the Orissa Estates Abolition Act, annexed as Annexure 9.

After stating the facts it is found :

4. It is necessary to state some admitted features of this case before entering into a discussion on the merits of the contentions raised by counsel on their side. The properties in question are the waqf properties of mosque, Juma Masjid and Sk. Wahabullah was the Motwali. Though the lands vested under the provisions of the Orissa Estates Abolition Act on 18-3-1974, no application had been filed to the Collector under the said Act for settlement within the stipulated period. The application which was filed in the year 1976 by Sk. Rasul Bux, the father of the present petitioners as well as the application filed by opposite parties 7 and 8 on 28-11-1977, are the applications not under the Orissa Estates Abolition Act, but under the Executive






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top