JUDGMENT :

S.C. Mohapatra, J. - Defendant in a pending suit is the Petitioner in this civil revision. The order permitting the Plaintiff to file some documents in the midst of the trial and to recall the Plaintiff as witness to prove the documents is assailed in this case.

2. The suit is one for damages. Plaintiff claims that on account of a letter issued by the Defendant his reputation has been greatly affected. He claims that as a reputed craftsman, he had extensive travel to many parts of the World and had also received National Award on account of his superior craftsmanship. In spite of it the Defendant has damaged his reputation by addressing a letter. In the written statement, Defendant denied the allegations including the issue of the letter.

3. While the Plaintiff was examined as P.W. 2 in cross-examination he stated:

I can show documents to the effect that I had been to London, U.S.A. Japan and other Countries.

I can show documents to the effect that I was exporting Budha's Statute to different Countries. At present. I cannot show any documents.

At another stage, to a question in cross-examination, he answered.

I have not produced my certificates of getting awards.

4. After record