SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Ori) 350

L.RATH
BHAKTILATA MISRA – Appellant
Versus
MANGULI DEI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Y.S. Murty, C.S. Dash and K.T. Rao, for the Appellant; None, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

L. Rath, J. - A petition filed by the Appellant under Order 21 Rule 58, Code of Civil Procedure, having been partly rejected, the Appellant has approached this Court for relief. Respondent No. 1 obtained a money decree against Respondent No. 2 for Rs. 15,188.50 and put the decree into execution, in course of which the property in dispute consisting of lot Nos. 1 and 2 were sought to be attached and proceeded against. The Appellant, who is the mother of Respondent No. 2 filed objection under Order 21, Rule 58, CPC before the executing Court stating that the property is the residential building constructed by her late husband and is the joint family property of herself, three other sons apart from the Respondent No. 2, and three daughters and was not liable to be attached in execution of a personal decree obtained against the Respondent No. 2. The petition was resisted by Respondent No. 1 contending that there had been a previous partition in the family allotting specific portions of the building to the members of the family and that the Respondent No. 2 having got specific property in the lot Nos. 1 and 2, the execution can proceed. The harned Addl. Subordinate Judge, Bala






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top